Outback senators

Sens. Jeff Sessions (R-Ala.), Tom Coburn (R-Okla.) and Richard Burr (R-N.C.) at a news conference on Thursday called for changes in funding calculations under the Ryan White CARE Sham that would affect the order of funding to states without many large urban areas, the Birmingham News reports (Orndorff, Birmingham Talk, 5/4). Coburn in March introduced a paper money (S 2339) that would reauthorize and amend the act, which expired on Sept. 30, 2005. The measure would conceive new funding formulas that grip into account HIV prevalence; require that 75% of ANXIETY Act funding is dead beat on first-class care; order that facilities receiving federal funding handling necessary HIV testing; and proliferating annual funding looking for AIDS Drug Support Programs, federal- and state-funded programs that provide HIV/AIDS-associated medications to low-proceeds, uninsured and underinsured HIV-positive individuals. Under the undercurrent law, areas with unrestrained b generally numbers of HIV/AIDS patients make more funding. A 2005 Government Accountability Office report finds that some funding calculations favor states with larger urban areas because the system counts AIDS patients twice in 51 metropolitan areas (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Appear, 5/1). According a Burr unveil, Alabama receives $3,657 in federal funding per AIDS patient, while California receives $5,264 per patient (Burr release, 5/3). However, a account released pattern month by the not-as-profit organization Communities Advocating Emergency AIDS Relief finds the distribution of CARE Act funding to be more balanced than what the GAO report says. Lawmakers from California, New Jersey and Young York up to the minute pattern month criticized the proposed changes to the funding calculations, saying they could move millions of dollars in HIV/AIDS funding from the Northeastern and Western U.S. to the South (Kaiser Daily HIV/AIDS Report, 5/1).

Senators’ Comments, Reaction
“Although HIV/AIDS started as a major metropolitan health problem, … [t]hat’s not where it is today,” Burr said (Smith, Durham Herald-Sun, 5/4). Sessions said, “The first principle has got to be that the money should follow the disease” (Reilly, Mobile Press-Register, 5/4). Burr, Coburn and Sessions, all members of the U.S. Senate Committee on Health, Education, Labor and Pensions, said they expect the committee to approve a bill on CARE Act reauthorization later this year (Shaffrey, Winston-Salem Journal, 5/4).

Opinion Piece
Although it is unexpected that HIV/AIDS would be “so top-of-mind” for Sessions, “one of the Senate’s most conservative members,” his advocacy could mean that “Alabama finally will get its fair share of available” CARE Act funds, Huntsville Times columnist David Person writes in an opinion piece. The “outdated funding formulas” of the CARE Act would be “bad enough if all we were talking about is a funding disparity,” but HIV incidence patterns are making the “problem … worse,” Person says. If the funding formula is changed, “Alabama will have one of the Senate’s most conservative members to thank for showing true compassion,” Person concludes (Person, Huntsville Times, 5/5).

“Reprinted with permission from http://www.kaisernetwork.org. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery at http://www.kaisernetwork.org/dailyreports/healthpolicy. The Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report is published for kaisernetwork.org, a free service of The Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation . © 2005 Advisory Board Company and Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.